Home / Product / Design Review

Design Review

Move design review from repetitive coordination to a structured process.

Submissions, comments, actions, revisions and approvals stay connected to the drawing and the unit — so every cycle starts where the last one ended.

01

Upload

Tenant submits drawings

02

Review

Disciplines assess

03

Comments

Pinned to the drawing

04

Actions

Owners and due dates

05

Revision

Linked to comments

06

Approval

Recorded against unit

Try it

The review workspace

Mark each design criterion compliant or non-compliant, add comments from the library, then issue feedback to the tenant.

Mall Expansion — Phase 02 / F&B-214 Coffee concept / Detailed design · Rev C

Shopfront · 9 criteria · 0 of 9 reviewed

Design sections: Shopfront · Signage · Ceiling & Lighting · MEP

1.1 Site Verification and Demarcation

The tenant verifies site conditions, including the bulkhead, demising walls, piers and columns, and confirms the unit's limits against the lease outline drawing before setting out.

Not reviewed

1.2 Interface Transition Details

Junction details between the tenant's fit-out and the landlord's works are included in the detailed design submission, with a shadow gap at each junction.

Not reviewed

1.3 Projection

No shopfront element other than approved signage projects beyond the lease line.

Not reviewed

1.4 Structural Elements

The shopfront is self-supporting and independent of the landlord's bulkhead. Columns and walls at the lease line are finished by the tenant as part of the shopfront.

Not reviewed

1.5 Bulkhead

The bulkhead aligns with adjacent units, stays within the permitted drop and is finished in a single colour.

Not reviewed

1.6 Materials and Finishes

Samples of proposed shopfront materials and finishes are submitted for landlord approval before installation.

Not reviewed

1.7 Glazing

Shopfront glazing meets the specified glass type and panel sizes, with joints shown on the drawings.

Not reviewed

1.8 Enclosure

Shutters and posts are concealed within the shopfront, and doors open inward without crossing the lease line.

Not reviewed

1.9 Lighting and Illumination

The shopfront is well lit and consistent with the centre's overall lighting.

Not reviewed

Illustrative data

The problem

Why review cycles drag.

Review cycles drag because of everything around the review.

01

Repeated comments

The same issues are raised across units and review cycles.

02

Missing information

Incomplete submissions stall reviews before they start.

03

Version confusion

It is not always clear which revision is current.

04

Waiting without owners

Between reviews, nobody is sure who holds the next action.

What VRDnet structures

Reviewers make the judgement; VRDnet structures the submission, the comments and the decision record.

Structured submissions

Checklists based on your design criteria make sure submissions arrive complete.

Discipline-based comments

Architecture, MEP, fire, signage — pinned to the drawing and grouped.

Action ownership

Every comment has an owner and a due date, with reminders.

Revision history

Each revision links back to the comments it responds to.

Approvals with conditions

Approve, approve with conditions or request revision — recorded against the unit.

Review audit trail

A complete history of who reviewed, commented and approved, and when.

Case study 02 · Mall expansion programme

How a landlord team brought design approvals for a new phase into one reviewable workflow.

Read Case Study →

Design review, structured

Give every review cycle a clear next step.

See how VRDnet connects submissions, comments, revisions and approvals to the unit.